The Interconnection of Social Problems Review the article, Race, poverty and punishment: The impact of criminal sanctions on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequality, as you to prepare for this paper. As Wheelock and Uggen (2006) point out, “the association between crime, punishment, and poverty has long been the subject of sociological and criminological investigation” (p. 1). This assignment is intended illustrate the interconnection of social problems. Write a paper discussing the overlap of crime, punishment, and poverty. In your paper, please explain the following five core arguments made by the authors: a.Criminal sanctions and victimization work to form a system of disadvantage that perpetuates stratification and poverty. b.Punishment impacts individuals convicted of felonies, as well as their families, peer groups, neighborhoods, and racial group. c.After controlling for population differences, African Americans are incarcerated approximately seven times as often as Whites. d.Variation in criminal punishment is linked to economic deprivation. e.As the number of felons and former felons rises, collateral sanctions play an ever-larger role in racial and ethnic stratification, operating as an interconnected system of disadvantage. Academic Research Reminder: Academic research papers must meet university level standards of quality recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality, academic research? a.Primary (original) sources written by experts in the field of study. b.Secondary sources supported by research in primary sources. c.Credible sources (experts in the field; well-known theorists; sources which use primary and secondary sources to support claims). d.Relevant research (materials are pertinent to the area of study). e.In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required. f.Educational and government websites (those ending with a web URL suffix of .edu or .gov) may be appropriate in some cases but should be evaluated carefully. The paper must be three to four pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources other than the textbook and required readings to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation . Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.Description:Total Possible Score: 10.00Discusses the Overlap of Crime, Punishment, Race, and Poverty Based on Wheelock and Uggen’s Five Core ArgumentsTotal: 7.00Distinguished – Provides an exceptionally thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which all of the five core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion displays solid reasoning throughout and is well supported by relevant scholarly sources.Proficient – Provides a moderately thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which at least four core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion mostly displays solid reasoning and is supported by scholarly sources.Basic – Provides a somewhat thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which at least three core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion displays reasoning, but may not be adequately supported by scholarly sources.Below Expectations – Attempts to discuss the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty; however, the discussion addresses fewer than three core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen, displays poor reasoning, and/or lacks support from scholarly sources.Non-Performance – The discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Written Communication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 1.00Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Resource RequirementTotal: 1.00Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.APA FormattingTotal: 0.50Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Page RequirementTotal: 0.50Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

The Interconnection of Social Problems Review the article, Race, poverty and punishment: The impact of criminal sanctions on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequality, as you to prepare for this paper. As Wheelock and Uggen (2006) point out, “the association between crime, punishment, and poverty has long been the subject of sociological and criminological investigation” (p. 1). This assignment is intended illustrate the interconnection of social problems. Write a paper discussing the overlap of crime, punishment, and poverty. In your paper, please explain the following five core arguments made by the authors: a.Criminal sanctions and victimization work to form a system of disadvantage that perpetuates stratification and poverty. b.Punishment impacts individuals convicted of felonies, as well as their families, peer groups, neighborhoods, and racial group. c.After controlling for population differences, African Americans are incarcerated approximately seven times as often as Whites. d.Variation in criminal punishment is linked to economic deprivation. e.As the number of felons and former felons rises, collateral sanctions play an ever-larger role in racial and ethnic stratification, operating as an interconnected system of disadvantage. Academic Research Reminder: Academic research papers must meet university level standards of quality recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality, academic research? a.Primary (original) sources written by experts in the field of study. b.Secondary sources supported by research in primary sources. c.Credible sources (experts in the field; well-known theorists; sources which use primary and secondary sources to support claims). d.Relevant research (materials are pertinent to the area of study). e.In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required. f.Educational and government websites (those ending with a web URL suffix of .edu or .gov) may be appropriate in some cases but should be evaluated carefully. The paper must be three to four pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources other than the textbook and required readings to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation . Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.Description:Total Possible Score: 10.00Discusses the Overlap of Crime, Punishment, Race, and Poverty Based on Wheelock and Uggen’s Five Core ArgumentsTotal: 7.00Distinguished – Provides an exceptionally thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which all of the five core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion displays solid reasoning throughout and is well supported by relevant scholarly sources.Proficient – Provides a moderately thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which at least four core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion mostly displays solid reasoning and is supported by scholarly sources.Basic – Provides a somewhat thoughtful and detailed discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty, in which at least three core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen are explained. The discussion displays reasoning, but may not be adequately supported by scholarly sources.Below Expectations – Attempts to discuss the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty; however, the discussion addresses fewer than three core arguments made by Wheelock and Uggen, displays poor reasoning, and/or lacks support from scholarly sources.Non-Performance – The discussion of the overlap of crime, punishment, race, and poverty is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Written Communication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 1.00Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Resource RequirementTotal: 1.00Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.APA FormattingTotal: 0.50Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Page RequirementTotal: 0.50Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.