Question Description
I will post my assignment and I would like from you to make a vane on it the be better according to the instruction
please I need to get a full mark
review and revise your document using the input from your classmate to assist your own revision process. Be sure to edit the document for grammar and spelling prior to turning it in. For convenient reference, the assignment is included below.
Problem description: You oversee a manufacturing facility that produces an automotive part (steel shaft for the gearbox). The acceptable dimension of the shaft is 2.5±0.05 inches in diameter with the most desirable product having a diameter of exactly 2.5 inches. Two vendors are trying to sell your company, Automotive Parts Corporation, their machines for the shaft-machining task. You have been asked to assess the machines from each vendor, and to make a recommendation for a machine vendor supported by a justification for your decision.
You asked both vendors to supply data on the machining accuracy of their machines for the given task. Both vendors machined 100 shafts, collected data, plotted histograms, fitted the histograms with normal distributions and supplied you with their findings.
Let X= diameter in inches of the gearbox shaft
Ace Machines: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.48 and variance 0.001
Best Machinery: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.51 and variance 0.002
When you are completing your memorandum be sure to address the following:
- Recommend a vendor using the given information, develop and discuss your approach (give all details including quantitative justification). Your response to this question must be directed to the audience described below.
- Examine the scenario as described and discuss what additional information would be helpful to make this recommendation a stronger selection, and why that information would be useful. Be careful not to negate your recommendation as you explain this.
- Include your calculations as a titled addendum on its own page at the end of your document
Audience: You are creating this document for the company’s Chief Operating Officer, Lin Gerard, and copying the Chief Financial Officer, Aileen Kitts. Documents involved in major financial decisions like this may also be distributed by the addressees to other executives and the corporate board members.
Document: Complete this assignment as a memorandum. Utilize clear, professional language, including setting your Word preferences to more professional settings. Examples of professional language constraints would include:
- Utilize plain language (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
- Develop the document around a direct, coherent message (thesis) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and clear analysis (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to support it.
- Do not use contractions, slang or colloquialisms, clichés (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., abbreviations, or text message shortcuts.
Follow the guidance for a business memorandum
provided in your reading.
DUE: April 4, 2019
Rubric
Writing Assignment 2.5 P&S (Sp19 Dr. S)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemorandum header is completedThe layout and content follow Document/Memorandum header instructions in “How to Write a Business Memorandum” |
|
2.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe summary is included and well writtenThe Summary is included and follows the requirements in “How to Write a Business Memorandum” . The summary is clear, complete and consice. |
|
2.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis section is includedAn analysis section is included following the guidance in “How to Write a Business Memorandum”. The section is clear, complete and concise. (It is NOT a step-by-step presentation of the calculations.) |
|
3.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraphics are included to support the case you are makingThe graphic(s) included must support your recommendation by making points more clearly than can be made in writing alone. They are clearly labeled within the graphic and include a figure or table label and number with a title that is located correctly. (review readings if needed) |
|
2.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion is includedA conclusion is included includes the elements in “How to Write Your Business Memorandum with a Recommendation”. The section is clear and concise. |
|
2.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix is includedAn addendum is included using the formatting indicated in “How to Write YOur Business Memorandum with a Recommendation” |
|
1.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe assignment does not address the correct problem (minus 1 point) |
|
0.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe correct audience was not addressed (minus 1 point) |
|
0.0pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatisitical Calculation is correct |
|
3.0pts |
||||
|
Total Points: 15.0 |
||||||
14 mins ago
ATTACHMENTS
I will post my assignment and I would like from you to make a vane on it the be better according to the instruction please I need to get a full mark review and revise your document using the input from your classmate to assist your own revision process. Be sure to edit the document for grammar and spelling prior to turning it in. For convenient reference, the assignment is included below. Problem description: You oversee a manufacturing facility that produces an automotive part (steel shaft for the gearbox). The acceptable dimension of the shaft is 2.5±0.05 inches in diameter with the most desirable product having a diameter of exactly 2.5 inches. Two vendors are trying to sell your company, Automotive Parts Corporation, their machines for the shaft-machining task. You have been asked to assess the machines from each vendor, and to make a recommendation for a machine vendor supported by a justification for your decision. You asked both vendors to supply data on the machining accuracy of their machines for the given task. Both vendors machined 100 shafts, collected data, plotted histograms, fitted the histograms with normal distributions and supplied you with their findings.Let X= diameter in inches of the gearbox shaftAce Machines: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.48 and variance 0.001Best Machinery: X has a normal distribution with mean 2.51 and variance 0.002When you are completing your memorandum be sure to address the following: Recommend a vendor using the given information, develop and discuss your approach (give all details including quantitative justification). Your response to this question must be directed to the audience described below.Examine the scenario as described and discuss what additional information would be helpful to make this recommendation a stronger selection, and why that information would be useful. Be careful not to negate your recommendation as you explain this.Include your calculations as a titled addendum on its own page at the end of your documentAudience: You are creating this document for the company’s Chief Operating Officer, Lin Gerard, and copying the Chief Financial Officer, Aileen Kitts. Documents involved in major financial decisions like this may also be distributed by the addressees to other executives and the corporate board members. Document: Complete this assignment as a memorandum. Utilize clear, professional language, including setting your Word preferences to more professional settings. Examples of professional language constraints would include:Utilize plain language (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Develop the document around a direct, coherent message (thesis) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and clear analysis (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to support it.Do not use contractions, slang or colloquialisms, clichés (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., abbreviations, or text message shortcuts.Follow the guidance for a business memorandum provided in your reading. DUE: April 4, 2019RubricWriting Assignment 2.5 P&S (Sp19 Dr. S)Writing Assignment 2.5 P&S (Sp19 Dr. S)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemorandum header is completedThe layout and content follow Document/Memorandum header instructions in “How to Write a Business Memorandum”2.0 ptsThe memorandum header is complete and correctThe memorandum header follows the provided standard, including an appropriate subject line.1.6 ptsThe memorandum header is weak in one areaThe memorandum header is weak in one area but is otherwise is well done1.2 ptsMemorandum header is poorly doneThe Memorandum header is missing multiple elements or is substantially incomplete or incorrect0.0 ptsThe memorandum header is missing or extremely poorly done2.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe summary is included and well writtenThe Summary is included and follows the requirements in “How to Write a Business Memorandum” . The summary is clear, complete and consice.2.0 ptsThe summary is well doneThe summary is complete, clear and concise1.6 ptsThe summary weak in one areaThe summary is weak in one area but otherwise is well done1.2 ptsThe summary is poorly doneThe summar is incomplete and/or unclear.0.0 ptsThe summary is missing or extremely poorly done2.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis section is includedAn analysis section is included following the guidance in “How to Write a Business Memorandum”. The section is clear, complete and concise. (It is NOT a step-by-step presentation of the calculations.)3.0 ptsThe analysis is well doneThe analysis is complete, clear, and consice2.4 ptsThe analysis weak in one areaThe analysis is weak in one area but otherwise completed well1.8 ptsThe analysis section is poorly doneThe analysis is incomplete and/or unclear0.0 ptsThe analysis section is missing or not completed in plain languagehe analysis section is missing or does not provide a plan language description, instead just walks through the calculations.3.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraphics are included to support the case you are makingThe graphic(s) included must support your recommendation by making points more clearly than can be made in writing alone. They are clearly labeled within the graphic and include a figure or table label and number with a title that is located correctly. (review readings if needed)2.0 ptsGraphic(s) is/are well doneGraphic are used to enhance the memorandum. They are included in an appropriate location in the document and are labeled completely in the image and are numbered and titled1.6 ptsThe graphics are weak in one areaGraphic(s) is/are missing elements but are otherwise done as required1.2 ptsGraphic(s) is/are poorly doneGraphics are incomplete and/or do not support the case0.0 ptsGraphics are missing2.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion is includedA conclusion is included includes the elements in “How to Write Your Business Memorandum with a Recommendation”. The section is clear and concise.2.0 ptsThe conclusion is well doneThe conclusion included the required elements and is clear and concise.1.6 ptsThe conclusion is weak in one areaThe conclusion weak in one area but is otherwise done correctly1.2 ptsThe conclusion is poorly doneThe conclusion is missing significant elements and/or is unclear0.0 ptsThe conclusion is missing or very poorly done2.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix is includedAn addendum is included using the formatting indicated in “How to Write YOur Business Memorandum with a Recommendation”1.0 ptsThe addendum is included and formatted correctly0.0 ptsThe addendum is not included or is not formatted correctly1.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe assignment does not address the correct problem (minus 1 point)0.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsProblem is not addressed (minus 1 point)0.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe correct audience was not addressed (minus 1 point)0.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsThe correct audience was not addressed (minus 1 point)0.0ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatisitical Calculation is correct3.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsNo Marks3.0ptsTotal Points: 15.014 mins agoATTACHMENTS
